Hi there

wondering if somebody can help me understand why a model scenario gives different results when ran singly and when run in a loop with other scenarios. For example, when I run it singly, my set up is as follow:

```
Loop(scenario$(ord(scenario) lt 3 and ord(scenario) eq 2),
if(ord(scenario) eq 1,
* do something
);
if(ord(scenario) eq 2,
* do something
);
if(ord(scenario) eq 3,
* do something
);
);
```

and the result was “optimal solution”.

But when I run it continuous as follow:

```
loop(scenario$(ord(scenario) lt 3),
if(ord(scenario) eq 1,
* do something
);
if(ord(scenario) eq 2,
* do something
);
if(ord(scenario) eq 3,
* do something
);
);
```

I got different results. For scenario 2, the result was terminated by solver (** Feasible solution. The tolerances are minimal and there is no change in objective although the reduced gradient is greater than the tolerance.).

I have read a few materials that says it might be scaling, smooth formulations or stalling but am curious why different results.